ba9ef9741e
Batch of red-team r3 fixes that were in the working tree before the 2026-09-28 design overhaul, committed as one unit with their tests. - desktop main: STT timeouts and sidecar, voice recording store, sync (credentials, audio, knowledge reindex, push gates), runtime provisioner, update policy, AltGr keybindings, voice-command policy, dictionary file codec/limits, meeting transcript condensing and a local recording ledger so interrupted-session recovery only closes meetings this device recorded (a phone's live meeting is left alone). - mobile: login CSRF via implicit token callbacks rejected, account deletion/retention, durable queue retention, knowledge realtime without unfiltered DELETE, meeting re-record failure paths, cloud STT client, preferences store/resync. - core: text chunking splits long unbroken transcripts to fit, template field policy, dictionary limits, meeting markdown inline handling. - server: payple webhook policy and cancellation order scope, meeting document generation quota, team RPC null-role guard, unified LLM quota in-flight accounting, knowledge chunk vector index, meeting re-record failure paths (migrations 20260929*). - ci: portable/runtime feed gates, update-policy schema, Forgejo file delete and alias planning. Four older tests are updated to the new contracts rather than the old behavior: token-pair auth callbacks are rejected, knowledge realtime no longer subscribes to DELETE, long transcript lines are split, and meeting recovery requires the local recording ledger for empty rows.
59 lines
2.3 KiB
TypeScript
59 lines
2.3 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest'
|
|
import {
|
|
findTemplateFieldIdProblem,
|
|
nextTemplateFieldId,
|
|
nextTemplateFieldNumber,
|
|
templateFieldIdProblems,
|
|
} from '../src/template-field-policy'
|
|
|
|
const ids = (...values: string[]) => values.map((id) => ({ id }))
|
|
|
|
describe('templateFieldIdProblems', () => {
|
|
it('유효한 id는 문제가 없다', () => {
|
|
expect(templateFieldIdProblems(ids('a', 'b', 'c'))).toEqual([null, null, null])
|
|
expect(findTemplateFieldIdProblem(ids('a', 'b'))).toBeNull()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('빈 id와 공백뿐인 id는 empty', () => {
|
|
expect(templateFieldIdProblems(ids('a', '', ' '))).toEqual([null, 'empty', 'empty'])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('겹치는 id는 모든 행이 duplicate', () => {
|
|
expect(templateFieldIdProblems(ids('field3', 'x', 'field3'))).toEqual(['duplicate', null, 'duplicate'])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('id는 정확히 비교한다(자리표시자 키가 정확 일치이므로)', () => {
|
|
expect(templateFieldIdProblems(ids('a', ' a', 'A'))).toEqual([null, null, null])
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('findTemplateFieldIdProblem은 첫 문제의 위치와 id를 돌려준다', () => {
|
|
expect(findTemplateFieldIdProblem(ids('a', 'b', 'b'))).toEqual({ index: 1, id: 'b', problem: 'duplicate' })
|
|
expect(findTemplateFieldIdProblem(ids('a', ''))).toEqual({ index: 1, id: '', problem: 'empty' })
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('nextTemplateFieldId', () => {
|
|
it('빈 목록이면 field1', () => {
|
|
expect(nextTemplateFieldId([])).toBe('field1')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('중간 필드를 지운 뒤에도 기존 id를 다시 만들지 않는다 (회귀: 개수 기반 번호)', () => {
|
|
// [field1, field2, field3]에서 field1을 지움 → 개수+1 = field3 (중복)
|
|
expect(nextTemplateFieldId(ids('field2', 'field3'))).toBe('field4')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('사용자가 이름을 바꾼 필드도 번호 계산에 넣는다', () => {
|
|
expect(nextTemplateFieldNumber(ids('recipient', 'field7', 'body'))).toBe(8)
|
|
expect(nextTemplateFieldId(ids('recipient', 'body'))).toBe('field1')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('추가·삭제를 섞어 반복해도 id가 겹치지 않는다', () => {
|
|
const fields = ids('field1')
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < 6; i += 1) {
|
|
fields.push({ id: nextTemplateFieldId(fields) })
|
|
fields.push({ id: nextTemplateFieldId(fields) })
|
|
fields.splice(i % fields.length, 1)
|
|
expect(findTemplateFieldIdProblem(fields)).toBeNull()
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
})
|